View Single Post
Old 29th July 2006, 08:05 AM
jeremiahsjohnso jeremiahsjohnso is offline
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 19
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 25
Rep Power: 0
jeremiahsjohnso is on a distinguished road
<< Originally Posted by aka23
What was the bet size and # of hands played?

You would have a high risk of busting under the current bonus setup requiring 40xB playthrough (on VP). With a £4 bet, ~5500 hands are required to meet the playthrough. There is a 13-30% chance of busting, depending on VP game. With a £16 bet ~1400 hands are required. There is a 35-80% chance of busting, depending on VP game. >>

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet
That's not the point.

The point was that NannyRose was being ripped-off by Mansion casino with their short-pay video poker.

There's nothing wrong with having short-pay video poker, but you have to tell people.

On average they were taking at least 3% more than they claimed they were from the game description.

This is unacceptable.
And if the bonus is complete-the-playthrough-and-then-receive, there's no such thing as busting it. No doubt plenty of people had been losing their initial deposit (sooner rather than later due to the house edge) and then redepositing in order to complete the requirements.
Reply With Quote