Here's the paragraph I took note of
Quote:
|
Having new overseas processors can spring up does present a problem, Mr. Leach said. But if the bill becomes law, it would also prohibit American financial institutions from transferring money to overseas payment processors known to do a lot of business with casinos. In turn, it could make people work harder to place bets.
|
This is the first time I've read that the US House bill intents to also stop funding going to third-party payment processors for casinos, e.g. NETeller. Does anyone here want to dispute this interpretation of the bill?