[Freudian]

Here are some questions the casino need to answer to start clearing their name. The code is pretty irrelevant since we don't even know if that was indeed the code running. And logs would be pointless since if they indeed are guilty of wrongdoing, modifying logs to cover it up would be easy.

1. Why did they issue a statement saying there was nothing wrong the day after they patched for the alleged bug?

2. Why didn't they have separate development environments for code that was going to go live and experimental code like this alleged bonus game?

3. How did this buggy code find its way into the code that went live?

4. Who made the decision to design a bonus game with a non-random card dealing and introduce it in a card game? Didn't they think it would seriously create doubt about the fairness of their card games?

5. Why didn't testing catch this?

6. How come the results for the doubling game normalized the day before the casino claimed to have automatically patched it?

7. How much has English Harbour/Vegas Technology paid Michael Shackleford in the past? How much do they pay him now?

I am sure I forgot a bunch of questions that are relevant. Feel free to add them to my list.