View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28th May 2006, 02:41 AM
BlackjackInfo BlackjackInfo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 14
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 23
Rep Power: 0
BlackjackInfo is on a distinguished road
That's an interesting observation, and a question I have wondered about myself. One angle makes it good for savvy players though. It means the progressives are more likely to get to a point where the return on the machine is over 100%.

There's an ever better example of this at RTG, where the "It's Good to Be Bad" progressive has never hit at either denomination (25c or $1). (At least, since I've been tracking them for a year and a half.)

In that game, it's tough to stay the course and go for the progressive, because you're offered more and more free spins to bail out. I suspect that the 25c version is well over 100% return.
Reply With Quote