Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kengam
Explain how this is going to help us? Sounds like a waste of time to me. I am being civil, but I stand by my statement that you are hurting our chances of ever seeing the logs from years past.
|
Accusing me of being biased isn't that civil... I'm as interested the truth as everyone else, and I'm willing to go as far as I can in order to discover this truth.
The code was written without any knowledge of what the result would be. If it had turned out that the numbers were wrong, there likely would have been hell to pay. As it turns out, though, the scenario supports what has been seen in the logs.
I mentioned at least a couple of times in the last few days that I would be doing brute-force simulation as well as releasing that code publicly - and you made no mention of it then - why would you bring it up after the results of the simulation appear to support the casino? Would you have said the same thing if the results did not appear to support the casino?