View Single Post
  #611 (permalink)  
Old 24th May 2006, 04:53 AM
JohnGalt JohnGalt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: iugljk
Posts: 67
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 42
Rep Power: 0
JohnGalt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by spearmaster
You guys can cry for a full investigation all you like but I am simply not going to proceed without some evidence that there were indeed problems before this.

Of course you and they can do what you like. But I can only think of one reason why a casino would not want to take the relatively simple step of proving that their doubling game has been fair all along.

They went back 4 months. Why only 4 months? Why not 3 years? And according to you, they DID go back more than 4 months, since analyzing only 4 months would have made it impossible for them to make their initial statement that everything was okay. So why did they release results for only 4 months?