Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thelawnet
I could write something like this in a few hours, without question. Java is not my language, but I do write C# code, which is near identical, and having come up with a reason why a 50/50 game might not behave 50/50, and having a lot existing classes (random number libraries, cards, etc.), I think it would be pretty easy to come up with some code.
Again, I am not saying that that is the case, as we do not know. But it's absolutely incorrect to say that they could not have mocked up this code.
|
I asked you to try and write illogical code... LOL... it is very difficult to mock up something that doesn't make sense.
It is easy to write in a fix, no question of that. It is even easy to write a lot of routines and calls to classes to try and obfuscate the real intent - no question of that.
I am saying that what I saw in the code is not a fix, is not obfuscation - it's plain illogical! When something is illogical, it's because the programmer did NOT think clearly.
Quote:
Erm, yes we can, they said they had already scheduled an update for the software, and that explains how the code started behaving fairly, because they had previously arranged for the code to be fixed.
Why would you schedule an update of this nature, rather than just shutting the whole thing down?
This bit at least doesn't add up.
|
To be honest, I didn't ask this question. I also haven't asked either EH or Wiz how they determined the date, my assumption is that it was updated sometime on the 1st and thus not all results would have been normal - but that from the 2nd onwards all results should have been normal.