View Single Post
Old 21st May 2006, 10:12 PM
Slotster!'s Avatar
Slotster! Slotster! is offline
Twice as nice
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Location, Location!
Posts: 2,295
WTGs: 7
WTGd at 99 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks: 378
Thanked 1,172 Times in 483 Posts
Nominated 6 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 6424
Rep Power: 64
Slotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond reputeSlotster! has a reputation beyond repute
CM - What's your opinion on this clause in general for excluded games, and the resulting removal of ALL winnings?

As I've said a couple of times, I totally understand the casino are within their rights to do this - but what's your opinion on this sort of practice generally?

You mention they're right up there with 32RED... Can you ever imagine Ed and Pat and co pulling this sort of hard line with a player, for playing a version of video poker that they shouldn't.

I understand it's a mute point - but I'd be interested to see exactly HOW much was played at the excluded game.