View Single Post
  #181 (permalink)  
Old 5th May 2006, 07:55 PM
AceMan76 AceMan76 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 22
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 18
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 35
Rep Power: 0
AceMan76 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
We take your comments seriously and as such have spent time reviewing our Video Poker game play and also await some feedback on an independent review from a 3rd party.
Quote:
We have concluded our review of the game play and randomness for all Video Poker games.
Quote:
We have found, taking several sample sets over different and varying lengths of time, that they yield in our opinion, a non biased distribution of the cards.
Quote:
Should small sample sets be used to measure this metric, then results will vary as seems to be the case tracing through this thread.
LMAO on that one.

Quote:
We trust, that we have responded adequately and any doubt in peoples' mind are put to rest.
That one is a laugher too.

Perhaps English Harbour should reconsider the language they use in their initial responses . . . Maybe "we don't claim sh** until the independent 3rd party review is done".