View Single Post
  #174 (permalink)  
Old 5th May 2006, 02:53 PM
MarcyW MarcyW is offline
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: midwest
Posts: 43
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 12
Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 110
Rep Power: 0
MarcyW has been spending a lot of time in the forumMarcyW has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by dovmin
I want to share my thoery of what happened with the English harbour group let me know what you all think.


Theory number one, I got response from my mathematician friend and he had to say and he is right. The chance of that kind of result happening is possible but the chance that this kind of result is happening exactly when this guy tested them is zero.

They absolutely cheated, you might say it was not deliberately but I doubt it.

Theory number 2: I see in their terms and condition that many games are excluded for bonuses.

I bet that many bonus whoring players came there and use the doubling figure to maximize their winnings building their balance up and only then play the games which carry a high house edge.

The casino understood they need to fix their doubling figure to eliminate that and that what he did.

I played there and I can say that according to my feeling only no calculations two games are rigged there.

One, their Roulette and second the doubling at any Videopoker.

I remember casino bar response to the Wizard of odds issue, I remember they mentioned the fact there is a lot of bonus abuse in the industry and this is very hard to manage a casino anyway. Casinobar implied that of the line that they cheated to overcome the bonus abusers and I believe this is the reason a casino want to cheat.

They don't need to cheat in order to win without bonuses.

They need the cheating figure to cope with the chargebacker and Bonus abuser.
Unreal. A casino gives a bonus then needs to cheat so players can't win? Wow, I spit out my coffee on the keyboard I laughed so hard.
The Following User Says Thank You to MarcyW For This Useful Post:
A23456789TJQK (8th May 2006)