(this was in response to #145)
I think we're quibbling over the small points. The main issues as I see them:
1) Statistics from multiple sources here proved their
VP doubling rigged beyond the shadow of a doubt.
2) The problem suddenly corrected itself.
3) The casino issued an "all as well" statement that definitely applies to how things stand after #2.
I see their response as implying that the "all is well" also applies for issue #1, but without actually saying it. And I don't have any respect for the response, which is very lawyerly when, if they really wanted to remove player doubt, should have been very direct.
If I had a vote, I'd vote "rogue".