Thread: Mathematical Proof that English Harbour is cheating
View Single Post
  #135 (permalink)  
Old 3rd May 2006, 03:29 PM
Zoozie's Avatar
Zoozie Zoozie is offline
Meister Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,018
WTGs: 14
WTGd at 16 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 642
Thanked 1,145 Times in 369 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 6110
Rep Power: 48
Zoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casinomeister
This just in from English Harbour:
In theory, the number of Wins versus the number of losses and (excluding ties) will converge to 50% over a sample set that is large enough. .
Actually #wins/#losses SHOULD converge to 100%!!!
What we saw was actually that it did converge to something 50%!



Zoozie
The Following User Says Thank You to Zoozie For This Useful Post:
erp1 (6th May 2006)