Thread: Mathematical Proof that English Harbour is cheating
View Single Post
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 3rd May 2006, 03:05 PM
Zoozie's Avatar
Zoozie Zoozie is offline
Meister Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,018
WTGs: 14
WTGd at 16 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 642
Thanked 1,145 Times in 369 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 6110
Rep Power: 48
Zoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casinomeister
This just in from English Harbour:
....await some feedback on an independent review from a 3rd party.
No need for that. Unless they also send him back in time. Utterly BS.

What is needed a complete software review so we can be sure they can not cheat even if they wanted to.
I would not be surprised if the software has this double (50%) parameter as a standard parameter that can be configured to whatever
they want and when they want. This parameter has to be somewhere in the software. Hardcoded or configurable? The problem is that very few casinos use the software and would know this. If this is the case it could be proven very fast just by viewing the configuration utilities for the software.

Zoozie
Last edited by Zoozie; 3rd May 2006 at 03:19 PM.