View Single Post
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 2nd May 2006, 10:40 PM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Simmo! Simmo! is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,086
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 71 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 1,052
Thanked 2,424 Times in 1,178 Posts
Reputation Points: 12843
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by soflat
It was definitely not a random (fair) game.

We just don't know for sure if they were deliberately cheating or not (unless you can calculate that with Excel too).
Soflat is right. You may feel "cheated", it looks *very* suspicious, and it wasn't a random game. But the fact is we can only speculate as to why this came about. Yes it's incredibly fishy, but if you took this to a court of law claiming it was a deliberate "cheat" with the "proof" presented in this thread, you'll be in there for about 10 minutes. At best you'll get a ruling that it was an unfair game, but even then, do we know that EH state the gamble is supposed to be 50/50? Or have we just assumed that? (no, I really don't know)

Issues like this require a balanced view, not an emotional one, if they are to be taken anywhere. That's no sleight on you TLN, as I think this is one of the most interesting threads in a long time, and for me personally, I won't be playing here.
__________________

++++ OGGS.com Online Casino Reviews ++++ ++++



Last edited by Simmo!; 2nd May 2006 at 10:50 PM.